|
On May 19, Coronado voters will return to the polls to weigh in
on a number of statewide propositions and to elect a new member
to Coronado’s City Council, replacing Councilmember Casey Tanaka, who was elected Mayor last November.
MEET BARBARA DENNY
I’m a happily married homeowner who cares deeply
about Coronado and all the people who live here. I support
homeowners’ rights, our businesses, schools, hospital
and public safety. I oppose municipal parcel taxes,
the tunnel and overdevelopment.
Aided by former State Senator Dede Alpert, as a
private citizen I helped save the Coronado commuter
ferry service from de-funding by SANDAG. I served on
the executive board of the Coronado Transportation
Management Association. I am currently an attorney in
private practice with previous experience as the Land
Use Intern for former San Diego City Councilmember
Scott Peters and a Child Support Enforcement Attorney in the San Diego District
Attorney’s office. I also worked on staff in United States Senator Dianne Feinstein’s
San Diego office, proudly serving our military veterans at the national level.
Why I am the Right Choice:
I’m passionately dedicated to preserving our values and keeping Coronado on the
right track. I understand the complex issues involved in managing our density. I have
the background and experience to help our city put long-term smart growth into action
instead of shortsighted overdevelopment and lot splitting. I’m a strong advocate for
protecting citywide property values and preserving our community authenticity by
strengthening our Mills Act program. This will save historic homes from being torn
down and replaced with four homes where there was one. I’ll work hard to implement
financially affordable and environmentally safe alternatives to the tunnel.
MEET JERRY MITCHELL
I am a Coronado citizen of 31 years, having moved here
after retiring from the United States Marine Corps with the
rank of Colonel. My business career has mostly involved
real estate activities. More specifically, I developed two
residential tracts in San Diego, syndicated general partnerships
for the purpose of purchasing apartment complexes
and lastly I was co-owner and Vice President of
Prudential California Realty here in Coronado.
For over twenty years I served as member and
past chair of the Grand Caribe Task Force, which was
empanelled by the Board of Directors of the Coronado
Cays Homeowners Association (CCHOA). This committee was tasked with interacting
with the San Diego Unified Port District and the city of Coronado to express the
opposition of CCHOA to proposed commercial hotel development on Grand Caribe
Island, which is situated in the middle of our residential community. Ultimately after
challenging a myriad of commercial proposals involving hotels, timeshares and huge
commercial marinas, we prevailed. With the help of the city of Coronado we convinced
the Port District that such development was inappropriate and unsuitable for our
residential area.
Why I am the Right Choice:
I will bring to the Council a breadth of real world, everyday experience. My successful
business career, my four operational commands in the Marine Corps and my
service as a high ranking diplomat as Naval Attaché fortify me to contribute to sound
and sensible solutions.
MEET PHIL MONROE
I am a proud Navy veteran; served 30 years and
retired as a Captain. For five years I was a member of
the Coronado Planning Commission and eight years on
our City Council. For six years I represented Coronado on the Metropolitan Transit System and SANDAG Board of Directors.
My education includes a BA (mathematics) from
Cornell University and an Engineers Degree in
Aeronautical Engineering (AeE) from the Naval
Postgraduate School. My highest military award is the
Legion of Merit. Hobbies include tennis, golf and rollerblading.
With my wife, Fran, we maintain a love and
concern for four daughters.
Why I am the Right Choice:
Current economic times demand experienced leadership. Our city demands conservative
financial management. I bring these to the table. These times also require that
Coronado have strong regional representation. My past service has established strong,
positive relationships that will benefit Coronado on regional issues.
Although the city of Coronado’s reserve fund is quite healthy when compared to just about
any city in the state, the city is projecting decreased revenues in the coming years, and foresees
the possibility of dipping into reserves to meet expenses. What specific belt-tightening
measures, if any, would you recommend for the city in the months and years ahead?
Denny: At this time, none. Our city department heads have been asked to suggest specific
belt-tightening measures and I would like to hear what they propose. I believe they
know their departments best. I do not support using reserves to meet ongoing expenses
as suggested. We should strongly resist such behavior by adjusting our priorities to
protect reserves. With my strong educational background in accounting, finance and
economics, my votes on council will protect our financial health and promote sound
fiscal management.
Mitchell: With regard to the probability of
negative cash flow in our city budget, I
feel our Treasurer and City Manager are
right on top of this. We are projected
to go negative at the end of fiscal 2010.
Certain future projects have already been
identified that can be decreased, delayed
or deleted to avoid a negative cash flow.
It isn’t planned to dip into reserves but
rather cut or reduce some of these projects.
Among these are the Boat House/
Clubroom, the tennis center building,
Churchill Place improvement and the
Downtown Enhancement Project Phase
III. At this point, I would be prone to follow
the lead of the City Manager and the
Treasurer in selecting what must be cut.
Monroe: I’m proud that for the last eight
years my votes have been part of the
reason that our general fund reserve is
healthy. We currently have over 100
percent coverage of our annual budget
in reserve. I know of no city in the state
in a better financial position. Still, current
economic times demand conservative,
frugal, financial management of
our city’s expenses. I will work with the
Council to establish a policy that we
WILL live within our means, and not use
reserve funds for regular operations in
the General Fund budget. I would work
to direct our City Manager to scrub our
City Budget; department by department
and line by line to ensure that expenditures
do not exceed revenues. At this time,
because we have reserves, we do not need
to take dramatic action such as decrease
staff, reduce hours, eliminate programs or
raise fees. We built our reserves for a rainy
day. While other nearby cities are struggling,
we are yet to see that rainy day in
Coronado. My promise is to hold the line
on tapping this resource unless it is absolutely
required. My financial stewardship
of our city funds has provided us a cushion
for these difficult financial times.
If the Coronado Unified High School district
were to turn to the city of Coronado and
request financial assistance in operating the
pool or offer to turn the entire complex over
to the city, what would your position be?
Denny: Study results on this issue are
expected this summer. I would be open to
discussion about those results and then
take a reasonable position based on all the
facts. As a swimmer of forty years, this is
important to me. I have discussed it with
our school superintendent, school board
members, teachers, parents and students.
This would require creative problem solving.
I would oppose a municipal parcel
tax because it places an undue burden
on homeowners.
Mitchell: The fact of the matter is that it is
going to cost approximately $500,000 a
year to maintain it. When the school district
built the pool the city had no say in
determining how it could be sustainable.
Aquatic groups raised about $1.2 million
by promotional efforts such as selling
lanes. The pool has been managed by an
independent group for about four months
now. My understanding is that they are
already about $100,000 negative. Also it is
my understanding that the school district
has no funding for the pool maintenance.
At the end of the year we will have to determine
how much revenue the pool might be
able to generate through normal use fees
and group events, maybe $300,000 max.,
leaving a $200,000 deficit. Now the question
is: What happens if it is turned over to
the city? THIS IS A NO WIN SITUATION.
The city could assume the obligation in
these challenging financial times or it
could fill it in and abandon it. It cost about
$4.5 million to build. Either scenario is
unattractive. I am not smart enough to
offer a solution but I do wonder how we
got into this situation in the first place!
Monroe: I’m happy that our school district
leadership has indicated to me that the high school pool is a school district
problem to solve. I think we should all
get behind that effort and support their
strategies to make the pool successful. If
they need city help, I don’t look at it as an
all or nothing situation. Perhaps the city
can fund some programs that cannot be
accommodated in our city pool to assist
the school’s revenues. Before I would support
the city taking over the pool, I would
propose an Advisory Vote of our residents
like we recently conducted for the hospital
purchase. Current financial projections
for the city show that if the city takes
over the high school pool, other programs
will have to be cut or eliminated. There
are no extra funds in the city’s future.
Should the Mills Act cap be raised?
Denny: Yes. This will protect citywide
property values with the halo effect that
historic preservation brings by enhancing
community authenticity. Raising, or
better yet removing, the cap will end the
fifteen-year backlog and infuse our program
with fairness, predictability and
reliability. If operated as intended by
Senator Jim Mills, our program results in
no real loss to our city treasury, only an
unrealized gain of a relatively small portion
of funds (approximately $160,000)
compared to actual residential property
tax receipts ($13.6 million for fiscal year
2008-09).
Mitchell: The Mills Act cap should definitely
be raised. These historically significant
homes are the crown jewels of
our community. They are the very signature
of the ambiance that we treasure.
In the past, applicants have had to wait
long periods and backlogs have accumulated.
The present cap of $15,000 will be
inadequate to address this situation. This
will be a tough call for the council in the
financial climate that awaits us.
Monroe: I have consistently supported
historic preservation, and the Mill’s Act
funding. I call it an “Investment” the city
makes, not a cost. I support the total review
of our Historic Preservation Program. I
like the idea of lowering the Mill’s Act
savings per approved property in order
to have more properties included in the
program. I support raising the Mill’s Act
cap if it can be done responsibly within a
balanced budget. It is a priority for me.
Currently, the city of Coronado funds the
Coronado Historical Association at approximately
$350,000 annually to run a Visitor
Center. Do you feel this is appropriate? If
not, what would you propose?
Denny: I support the efforts of the
Coronado Historical Association in forming
an ad hoc committee on tourism. Led
by Board President Whitney Benzian,
this committee will include members of
all segments of our business community
and will devise an action plan for reaching
out-of-town tourists. At last count, the
historical association’s marketing efforts
reached 200,000 annual visitors. Using
existing resources, the new committee
will expand those efforts while keeping
within the parameters of the associationcity
contract goals.
Mitchell: With the downturn in our economy
some of our small businesses and
particularly our hotels are experiencing a
marked decline in revenue. I don’t believe
that any increase in “Visitor Promotion”
would help as this is a nationwide problem
wherein people just aren’t spending
like they use to. In addition, the city’s
transient occupancy taxes and real estate
taxes are likely to decline negating any
real possibility of allotting additional
funds for visitor promotion. I do, however,
believe the $350,000 per year for the
Visitor Center is appropriate.
Monroe: I feel the current contract for the
Visitor Center is appropriate. Coronado
is well known for great luxury hotels, a
wonderful beach, and a beautiful village.
When folks arrive, I want them welcomed
by our trained staff that will answer their
questions and tell them about the wonderful
things they can do in our unique
and wonderful community.
Do you have a pet project that hasn’t been
addressed in the previous questions?
Denny: As an alternative to the tunnel,
I support park-and-ride electric buses,
which are financially affordable and
environmentally friendly. The Navy’s
current pilot project for reducing commuter
car trips to area naval bases may
include electric buses. I have been speaking
with political and community leaders
in our region about the other component
of our traffic equation: civilian, non-resident
vehicle trips over the bridge. We are
working to locate park-and-ride points
around San Diego County to reduce the
number of vehicle trips over the bridge
and through our community.
Mitchell: If I am elected I want very much
to see the public safety items that have
been discussed come to fruition. These
are an additional engine company (staffing),
an additional engine, additional
ambulance staffing at the Cays, and an
additional ambulance.
Monroe: My pet project for the next two
years is addressed in Question 1. We are
in critical economic times. I will focus on
controlling city expenses. On this issue
my record is clear. I have been vetted
by my service and record. I am a financially
conservative leader. Current times
demand experienced leaders. |